PortlandWiki:GUI: Difference between revisions

From PortlandWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
Part of thinking about a new design is to see if we can look at other wikis out there. To see how other sites have evolved, and to deduce why they reached to that conclusion. Unless someone among us were part of the design, I can only analyze based on the conclusion. Sometimes this is called heuristics. We methodically look at other sites with similar purposes or similar technologies. We methodically note what we like.
Part of thinking about a new design is to see if we can look at other wikis out there. To see how other sites have evolved, and to deduce why they reached to that conclusion. Unless someone among us were part of the design, I can only analyze based on the conclusion. Sometimes this is called heuristics. We methodically look at other sites with similar purposes or similar technologies. We methodically note what we like.


{| class="wikitable" border="1"
|-
! Site
! Screenshot
|-
| '''WikiHow'''


===WikiHow===
Wikihow is a question and answers style Wiki.  This wiki does a pretty good job feeling warm and friendly and yet still reserved enough to not feel bloggy
[[File:Screenshot wikihow.jpg|thumb|WikiHow]]
 
WikiHow is a question and answers style Wiki.  This wiki does a pretty good job feeling warm and friendly and yet still reserved enough to not feel bloggy
* The top nav is great, though I would still contend taht the search block is more important than the Articles, Community & Profile items.
* The top nav is great, though I would still contend taht the search block is more important than the Articles, Community & Profile items.
* The 'Three-Step' is great looking. Lear, Write, Wiki -- Gorgeous!
* The 'Three-Step' is great looking. Lear, Write, Wiki -- Gorgeous!
| [[File:Screenshot wikihow.jpg|thumb|WikiHow ]]


===Beer Wiki===
|-
[[File:Screenshot wikia-beerwiki.jpg|thumb|Wikia's Beer Wiki]]
|  
'''Beer Wiki (Wikia)'''


This is a fun colorful wiki. Though it follows the Wikia template, which means the top navigation is actually a meta navigation between other wikis.  
This is a fun colorful wiki. Though it follows the Wikia template, which means the top navigation is actually a meta navigation between other wikis.  
Line 23: Line 28:
* What I like most about Beer Wiki is the fun graphic content. That's what I would want to bring to Piki are templates for placing images in a way that is fun and interesting.  
* What I like most about Beer Wiki is the fun graphic content. That's what I would want to bring to Piki are templates for placing images in a way that is fun and interesting.  


| [[File:Screenshot wikia-beerwiki.jpg|thumb|Wikia's Beer Wiki cwrap]]
|-
|
'''Diary of a Wimpy Kid(Wikia)'''
This is a fun colorful wiki. Though it follows the Wikia template, which means the top navigation is actually a meta navigation between other wikis.


===Diary of a Wimpy Kid Wiki===
* The google ads are lame, and create a confusing cloud of noise just above the brand.  
[[File:Screenshot wikia-wimpykid.jpg|thumb|Wikia's Diary of a Wimpy Kid Wiki]]


Another Wikia template so the problems that Beer Wiki are also in here. Otherwise the content is great! Love the big pictures here, I really like when a wiki can rely on images over text.
* What I like most about Beer Wiki is the fun graphic content. That's what I would want to bring to Piki are templates for placing images in a way that is fun and interesting.  


| [[File:Screenshot wikia-wimpykid.jpg|thumb|Wikia's Diary of a Wimpy Kid Wiki]]




===Fashion Wiki===
|-
[[File:Screenshot wikia-fashion.jpg|thumb|Wikia's Fashion Wiki]]
|  
'''Fashion Wiki(Wikia)'''


A part from looking like a consumer clothing retailer, Wikifashion is very very nice. Spacious and appealing. Though the layout is a bit complicated, I like the over all tone of the wiki. It uses subtle colors that make it feel warm and inviting.
A part from looking like a consumer clothing retailer, Wikifashion is very very nice. Spacious and appealing. Though the layout is a bit complicated, I like the over all tone of the wiki. It uses subtle colors that make it feel warm and inviting.




| [[File:Screenshot wikia-fashion.jpg|thumb|Wikia's Fashion Wiki]]
|-
|
'''Wetpaint'''
Likes, dislikes? Comments?
| [[File:Screenshot wetpaint.jpg|thumb|Wetpaint Wiki]]
|-
|
'''AOL Portal'''
Likes, dislikes? Comments?
| [[File:Screenshot aol.jpg|thumb|AOL Portal]]
|-
|
'''MSN'''


===Wetpaint===
Likes, dislikes? Comments?
[[File:Screenshot wetpaint.jpg|thumb|Wetpaint Wiki]]




| [[File:Screenshot msn.jpg|thumb|MSN Portal]]




===AOL===
|-
[[File:Screenshot aol.jpg|thumb|AOL Portal]]
|
'''Meetup.com'''


Likes, dislikes? Comments?




===MSN===
| [[File:Screenshot meetup.jpg|thumb|Meetup Portal]]
[[File:Screenshot msn.jpg|thumb|MSN Portal]]






|-


===Meetup===
|}
[[File:Screenshot meetup.jpg|thumb|Meetup Portal]]


==Top Navigation & 'C' wrap==
==Top Navigation & 'C' wrap==

Revision as of 10:10, 7 April 2011

PortlandWiki needs a new user interface! Help us build it. This page is a central dumping ground for ideas, wireframes, graphics, color schemes, and anything else related to improving our "look-and-feel"!

Competitive Assessment

Part of thinking about a new design is to see if we can look at other wikis out there. To see how other sites have evolved, and to deduce why they reached to that conclusion. Unless someone among us were part of the design, I can only analyze based on the conclusion. Sometimes this is called heuristics. We methodically look at other sites with similar purposes or similar technologies. We methodically note what we like.

Site Screenshot
WikiHow

Wikihow is a question and answers style Wiki. This wiki does a pretty good job feeling warm and friendly and yet still reserved enough to not feel bloggy

  • The top nav is great, though I would still contend taht the search block is more important than the Articles, Community & Profile items.
  • The 'Three-Step' is great looking. Lear, Write, Wiki -- Gorgeous!
WikiHow

Beer Wiki (Wikia)

This is a fun colorful wiki. Though it follows the Wikia template, which means the top navigation is actually a meta navigation between other wikis.

  • The google ads are lame, and create a confusing cloud of noise just above the brand.
  • What I like most about Beer Wiki is the fun graphic content. That's what I would want to bring to Piki are templates for placing images in a way that is fun and interesting.
Wikia's Beer Wiki cwrap


Diary of a Wimpy Kid(Wikia)

This is a fun colorful wiki. Though it follows the Wikia template, which means the top navigation is actually a meta navigation between other wikis.

  • The google ads are lame, and create a confusing cloud of noise just above the brand.
  • What I like most about Beer Wiki is the fun graphic content. That's what I would want to bring to Piki are templates for placing images in a way that is fun and interesting.
Wikia's Diary of a Wimpy Kid Wiki


Fashion Wiki(Wikia)

A part from looking like a consumer clothing retailer, Wikifashion is very very nice. Spacious and appealing. Though the layout is a bit complicated, I like the over all tone of the wiki. It uses subtle colors that make it feel warm and inviting.


Wikia's Fashion Wiki


Wetpaint

Likes, dislikes? Comments?


Wetpaint Wiki


AOL Portal

Likes, dislikes? Comments?


AOL Portal


MSN

Likes, dislikes? Comments?


MSN Portal


Meetup.com

Likes, dislikes? Comments?


Meetup Portal


Top Navigation & 'C' wrap

Sometimes called the 'wrapper' it is the part of the site that presents brand and top level navigation as well as development related tasks and actions. The current 2010 design has fairly large amount of screen real estate devoted to top navigation.

Screenshot of page. Red highlights the current cwrap
Screenshot of a standard page, Green highlights the key elements. Logo, Search, Account info


New wireframe for the top part of the cwrap
Design for the top part of the cwrap

Piki (portlandwiki) has a layout similar to Wikipedia and countless other wikis that use Wikimedia's software. That's not to say that this is a good or necessarily bad. It is important to think about priorities. What we see in the red below, is also the most important part of the screen. And what do we fill it with? Besides the main and events, we have publishing and editing related items.


By placing these items in the most valuable area, we are saying that publishing knowledge is more important than gaining knowledge. I contend the opposite. That the gaining and use of the knowledge is the most important. It is the learners and readers I think the UI has to cater more to.


The creators (or writers) are 'power' participants. Visit a lot, and they have an understanding of how wiki's work. Some of them even know how to code html. I don't have to worry about them. What ever limitation exists for the UI, they will over come them.

There are a couple items in the wrapper that deserve attention.

  1. the logo
  2. the search
  3. account related links

The tricky part will be to highlight these areas while streamlining the other areas of the cwrapper

With this particular design all the c-wrap elements have been put at the top, items that are in the side nav now could be in a pull-down (not shown)

Add three drop downs for main content and tools.