Liquified Natural Gas in Oregon: Difference between revisions

From PortlandWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(22 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
At the terminal, the LNG gas is transformed from liquid to a gaseous state and transported in a gaseous form through pipelines.  
At the terminal, the LNG gas is transformed from liquid to a gaseous state and transported in a gaseous form through pipelines.  


Three [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquefied_natural_gas Liquefied Natural Gas] projects have been proposed in Oregon —  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_LNG Oregon LNG] (near Astoria), [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradwood_Landing Bradwood Landing] (near Claskanie), and [http://www.jordancoveenergy.com/project.htm Jordan Cove] (near Coos Bay).
[[File:LNGTanker.jpg|center|600px|LNG Tanker]]


[http://www.oregonlng.com/project.php The Oregon LNG project], near Astoria, would include a marine receiving terminal, three full-containment 160,000 cubic meter LNG storage tanks, and facilities to support ship berthing and cargo offloading. The terminal would receive Liquefied natural gas shipped from overseas then transported down state through a new pipeline.  
Three [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquefied_natural_gas Liquefied Natural Gas] projects have been proposed in Oregon —  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_LNG Oregon LNG] (near Astoria), [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bradwood_Landing Bradwood Landing] (near Claskanie), and [http://www.jordancoveenergy.com/project.htm Jordan Cove] (near Coos Bay). All three proposals for LNG terminals in Oregon planned originally to IMPORT natural gas (in the interest of national security). The [http://www.ferc.gov/ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission] would have to sign off on any terminal.
 
Today, everything has flipped. Now both the Astoria and Coos Bay natural gas terminal proposals plan to EXPORT natural gas, not IMPORT it.
 
[http://www.oregonlng.com Oregon LNG], based in Warrenton, [http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2013/06/oregon_lgn_presses_ahead_on_fe.html#incart_river filed its formal application in June 2013] with the [http://www.ferc.gov/ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission] to build an LNG terminal with the capability to both import and export natural gas. [http://www.oregonpipelinecompany.com/ The Oregon Pipeline] will provide interconnections with an interstate gas pipeline.
 
A similar export terminal application was filed in May, 2013 by the backers of the [http://www.jordancoveenergy.com Jordan Cove LNG terminal] in Coos Bay. The proposed [http://www.pacificconnectorgp.com Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline] would provide a link from Coos Bay to an existing gas pipeline at Malin, Oregon.
 
[http://www.oregonlng.com/project.php The Oregon LNG project], near Astoria, would include a marine receiving terminal, three full-containment 160,000 cubic meter LNG storage tanks, and facilities to support ship berthing and cargo offloading. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_LNG The proposed Oregon LNG receiving facility] in Warrenton, Oregon, would be eight miles (13 km) west of Astoria, Oregon, on the Columbia River. The terminal originally planned to receive Liquefied natural gas shipped from overseas then transported down state through a new pipeline with a route similar to the competing Palomar Pipeline.  


[[File:Astoriagaspipeline.jpg|center|500px|Astoria LNG Pipeline]]
[[File:Astoriagaspipeline.jpg|center|500px|Astoria LNG Pipeline]]


[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_LNG The proposed Oregon LNG receiving facility] in Warrenton, Oregon, would be eight miles (13 km) west of Astoria, Oregon, on the Columbia River. The Astoria LNG proposal is the only Oregon LNG terminal that has not already received approval from the [http://www.ferc.gov/ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission].
[http://www.oregonlng.com Oregon LNG] battled Clatsop County officials over its right to build the pipeline that would bring in gas from the ships and move it to California. Skeptics say the entire economic rationale for importing natural gas to the United States has become questionable given the huge new reserves of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shale_gas shale gas] in the United States and Canada.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasland Gasland], a documentary by Josh Fox, explored environmental impact of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fracturing hydraulic fracturing] used to extract the gas.
 
Apparently the critics were right.
 
[http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2012/04/oregon_liquified_natural_gas_e.html Now Oregon LNG's plan has gone through a 180 degree change], reports The Oregonian. Now the same backers are proposing a $6 billion gas export facility, not a gas import facility.
[http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2012/03/port_of_coos_bay_wants_to_flip.html Another LNG export proposal for Coos Bay] went though a similar flip-flop, from import to export. Other export terminals are proposed on the coast of British Columbia, as well as the Gulf Coast of the United States. The successful use of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling techniques have flooded the domestic market with gas.
 
[[File:Warringtonlngpipe.jpg|center|500px|New proposal for Astoria LNG Pipeline]]
 
The three LNG facilities in Oregon that have been discussed are:
 
* [http://www.oregonlng.com/ Oregon LNG] says [http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2012/04/oregon_liquified_natural_gas_e.html export economics from Oregon stack up well against Gulf Coast competitors]. Oregon LNG ,in Warrington, is also proposing a different route for the pipeline. [http://www.thechronicleonline.com/news/article_4489ca5a-8fd6-11e1-b52c-001a4bcf887a.html The Warrenton export plant] would be operational by 2017 or 2018. An economic impact analysis done by [http://www.econw.com/news-and-events/ ECONorthwest] showed the facility is estimated to cost $5.8 billion with construction of the pipeline adding another $487 million between 2014 and 2018. The project is expected to employ an average of 3,024 workers per year during construction of the facility and provide 149 jobs, mostly to Oregon and Washington residents.
 
"LNG import was really unpopular in Clatsop County, and LNG export is going to be wildly unpopular in Clatsop County," said Dan Serres, an organizer with the conservation group Columbia Riverkeeper. Both Oregon LNG and the Jordan Cove LNG proposal in Coos Bay are at the start of a long permitting odyssey.
 
* [http://topics.oregonlive.com/tag/bradwood%20landing/posts.html The Bradwood Landing LNG import terminal], upriver near Claskanie, was apparently stopped in March of 2011, when [http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2011/03/palomar_gas_partners_pull_the.html a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision threw out the license for the Bradwood Landing terminal].  


[[File:Bradwood-landingjpg.jpg|center|500px|Proposed Bradwood Landing Site]]
[[File:Bradwood-landingjpg.jpg|center|500px|Proposed Bradwood Landing Site]]


[http://topics.oregonlive.com/tag/bradwood%20landing/posts.html The Bradwood Landing LNG import terminal], upriver near Claskanie, was apparently stopped in March of 2011, when [http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2011/03/palomar_gas_partners_pull_the.html a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision threw out the license for the Bradwood Landing terminal]. According to [http://www.columbiariverkeeper.org/ Columbia Riverkeeper] Executive Director Brett VandenHeuvel, "Bradwood LNG was a dominant environmental issue for five years and now it is officially over." Foes feared possible impacts on fish, forests and farms.  
According to [http://www.columbiariverkeeper.org/ Columbia Riverkeeper] Executive Director Brett VandenHeuvel, "Bradwood LNG was a dominant environmental issue for five years and now it is officially over." Foes feared possible impacts on fish, forests and farms.  


[[File:Palomar.pipeline.jpg|center|500px|Proposed Palomar pipeline.]]
[[File:Palomar.pipeline.jpg|center|500px|Proposed Palomar pipeline.]]


[http://www.sustainablebusinessoregon.com/articles/2010/05/lng_protest_planned_at_nw_natural_meeting.html The NorthernStar Natural Gas company] planned the Palomar Pipeline, a joint venture between NW Natural and Calgary, Alberta-based TransCanada Corp to import Liquified Natural Gas. A planned 36-inch diameter pipeline would stretch 217 miles from TransCanada’s Gas Transmission Northwest Pipeline in central Oregon to a point on the Columbia River near Astoria where it was to connect the Bradwood Landing project.
[http://www.sustainablebusinessoregon.com/articles/2010/05/lng_protest_planned_at_nw_natural_meeting.html The NorthernStar Natural Gas company] planned the Palomar Pipeline, feeding the Bradford landing export facility, upriver from Astoria. It was planned to be a joint venture between NW Natural and Calgary, Alberta-based TransCanada Corp to import Liquified Natural Gas. A planned 36-inch diameter pipeline would stretch 217 miles from TransCanada’s Gas Transmission Northwest Pipeline in central Oregon to a point on the Columbia River near Astoria where it was to connect the Bradwood Landing project.  
 
[http://www.oregonlng.com Oregon LNG] battled Clatsop County officials over its right to build the pipeline, but the entire economic rationale for importing natural gas to the United States has become questionable given the huge new reserves of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shale_gas shale gas] in the United States and Canada, reports The Oregonian.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasland Gasland], a documentary by Josh Fox, explored environmental impact of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fracturing hydraulic fracturing] used to extract the gas.


[[File:Coos.bay.gas map.jpg|center|500px|Coos Bay Natural Gas Pipeline Propsal]]
[[File:Coos.bay.gas map.jpg|center|500px|Coos Bay Natural Gas Pipeline Propsal]]


[http://www.jordancoveenergy.com/project.htm The Jordan Cove LNG storage facility] would be located within the [http://www.portofcoosbay.com/ Port of Coos Bay], approximately 7 nautical miles from the entrance of the navigation channel, and pipe it south to California. [http://www.oregon.gov/LUBA/index.shtml Oregon's Land Use Board of Appeals] has kicked back Coos County's approval of the [http://www.pacificconnectorgp.com/overview.php Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline], ordering the county to reconsider the project's impact on the Olympia Oyster.  
* [http://www.jordancoveenergy.com/project.htm The Jordan Cove LNG storage facility] would be located within the [http://www.portofcoosbay.com/ Port of Coos Bay], approximately 7 nautical miles from the entrance of the navigation channel, and pipe it south to California. [http://www.oregon.gov/LUBA/index.shtml Oregon's Land Use Board of Appeals] has kicked back Coos County's approval of the [http://www.pacificconnectorgp.com/overview.php Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline], ordering the county to reconsider the project's impact on the Olympia Oyster.  
   
   
[http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2011/03/land_use_board_orders_coos_cou.html The 234-mile pipeline would carry gas from the proposed Jordan Cove liquefied natural gas terminal in Coos Bay] to an interstate gas hub in Malin, near the California border in Central Oregon. From there, the gas would head south to California.
[http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2011/03/land_use_board_orders_coos_cou.html The 234-mile pipeline would carry gas from the proposed Jordan Cove liquefied natural gas terminal in Coos Bay] to an interstate gas hub in Malin, near the California border in Central Oregon. From there, the gas would head south to California.


[http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2012/03/port_of_coos_bay_wants_to_flip.html The Port of Coos Bay now wants to flip from importing to exporting liquefied natural gas], reports the Oregonian. Backers of the controversial [http://www.jordancoveenergy.com/ Jordan Cove Energy Project] are starting their regulatory odyssey anew, filing paperwork in Februrary, 2012 [http://www.jordancoveenergy.com/news.htm#032312 with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission]. Jordan Cove and the associated [http://www.pacificconnectorgp.com/ Pacific Connector] pipeline originally won federal approval in December 2009, only to become ensnared in state and local permitting issues.


[[File:Lifeline.systems.jpg|center|550px|Portland' Lifeline systems]]
[[File:Lifeline.systems.jpg|center|550px|Portland' Lifeline systems]]


[http://www.oregongeology.org/sub/default.htm Oregon Geology] maps out Portland's lifeline systems and [http://www.oregongeology.org/sub/earthquakes/Coastal/CoastalHazardsMain.htm Tsunami Hazard zones].
[[File:Shale-gas-map.jpg|center|550px|Shale Gas Map]]
[http://geology.com/energy/shale-gas/ Natural gas is trapped within shale formations]. The combination of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing has made large volumes of shale gas available for the first time and rejuvenated the natural gas industry in the United States. Shale gas resource and production estimates increased significantly between the 2010 and 2011 and are likely to increase further in the future.
Oregon Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley have both expressed reservations about gas exports because of likely impacts on domestic prices. Even LNG proponents concede that gas exports are likely to raise prices. And Rep. Peter DeFazio recently authored a bill that would prohibit the use eminent domain to build a pipeline if that pipe is used to export LNG, reports The Oregonian.


[http://www.oregongeology.org/sub/default.htm Oregon Geology] maps out Portland's lifeline systems and [http://www.oregongeology.org/sub/earthquakes/Coastal/CoastalHazardsMain.htm Tsunami Hazard zones].


<big>'''NEXT:</big> [[Fuel Cells in Oregon]]'''
<big>'''NEXT:</big> [[Bio Mass in Oregon]]'''


<big>'''Back to</big>: [[Green industry]] ''' <<
<big>'''Back to</big>: [[Green industry]] ''' <<

Latest revision as of 19:24, 11 June 2013

Liquified Natural Gas in Oregon is part of the Green industry portal

<< Back to: Green industry <<


Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is natural gas (predominantly methane) that has been converted temporarily to liquid form for ease of storage or transport. LNG takes up about 1/600th the volume of natural gas in the gaseous state. For ship transport, the gas is chilled to approximately negative 260 °F (127 °C), condensing the gas into a liquid, making it easier to ship.

At the terminal, the LNG gas is transformed from liquid to a gaseous state and transported in a gaseous form through pipelines.

LNG Tanker
LNG Tanker

Three Liquefied Natural Gas projects have been proposed in Oregon — Oregon LNG (near Astoria), Bradwood Landing (near Claskanie), and Jordan Cove (near Coos Bay). All three proposals for LNG terminals in Oregon planned originally to IMPORT natural gas (in the interest of national security). The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission would have to sign off on any terminal.

Today, everything has flipped. Now both the Astoria and Coos Bay natural gas terminal proposals plan to EXPORT natural gas, not IMPORT it.

Oregon LNG, based in Warrenton, filed its formal application in June 2013 with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to build an LNG terminal with the capability to both import and export natural gas. The Oregon Pipeline will provide interconnections with an interstate gas pipeline.

A similar export terminal application was filed in May, 2013 by the backers of the Jordan Cove LNG terminal in Coos Bay. The proposed Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline would provide a link from Coos Bay to an existing gas pipeline at Malin, Oregon.

The Oregon LNG project, near Astoria, would include a marine receiving terminal, three full-containment 160,000 cubic meter LNG storage tanks, and facilities to support ship berthing and cargo offloading. The proposed Oregon LNG receiving facility in Warrenton, Oregon, would be eight miles (13 km) west of Astoria, Oregon, on the Columbia River. The terminal originally planned to receive Liquefied natural gas shipped from overseas then transported down state through a new pipeline with a route similar to the competing Palomar Pipeline.

Astoria LNG Pipeline
Astoria LNG Pipeline

Oregon LNG battled Clatsop County officials over its right to build the pipeline that would bring in gas from the ships and move it to California. Skeptics say the entire economic rationale for importing natural gas to the United States has become questionable given the huge new reserves of shale gas in the United States and Canada. Gasland, a documentary by Josh Fox, explored environmental impact of hydraulic fracturing used to extract the gas.

Apparently the critics were right.

Now Oregon LNG's plan has gone through a 180 degree change, reports The Oregonian. Now the same backers are proposing a $6 billion gas export facility, not a gas import facility.

Another LNG export proposal for Coos Bay went though a similar flip-flop, from import to export. Other export terminals are proposed on the coast of British Columbia, as well as the Gulf Coast of the United States. The successful use of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling techniques have flooded the domestic market with gas.

New proposal for Astoria LNG Pipeline
New proposal for Astoria LNG Pipeline

The three LNG facilities in Oregon that have been discussed are:

"LNG import was really unpopular in Clatsop County, and LNG export is going to be wildly unpopular in Clatsop County," said Dan Serres, an organizer with the conservation group Columbia Riverkeeper. Both Oregon LNG and the Jordan Cove LNG proposal in Coos Bay are at the start of a long permitting odyssey.

Proposed Bradwood Landing Site
Proposed Bradwood Landing Site

According to Columbia Riverkeeper Executive Director Brett VandenHeuvel, "Bradwood LNG was a dominant environmental issue for five years and now it is officially over." Foes feared possible impacts on fish, forests and farms.

Proposed Palomar pipeline.
Proposed Palomar pipeline.

The NorthernStar Natural Gas company planned the Palomar Pipeline, feeding the Bradford landing export facility, upriver from Astoria. It was planned to be a joint venture between NW Natural and Calgary, Alberta-based TransCanada Corp to import Liquified Natural Gas. A planned 36-inch diameter pipeline would stretch 217 miles from TransCanada’s Gas Transmission Northwest Pipeline in central Oregon to a point on the Columbia River near Astoria where it was to connect the Bradwood Landing project.

Coos Bay Natural Gas Pipeline Propsal
Coos Bay Natural Gas Pipeline Propsal

The 234-mile pipeline would carry gas from the proposed Jordan Cove liquefied natural gas terminal in Coos Bay to an interstate gas hub in Malin, near the California border in Central Oregon. From there, the gas would head south to California.


The Port of Coos Bay now wants to flip from importing to exporting liquefied natural gas, reports the Oregonian. Backers of the controversial Jordan Cove Energy Project are starting their regulatory odyssey anew, filing paperwork in Februrary, 2012 with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Jordan Cove and the associated Pacific Connector pipeline originally won federal approval in December 2009, only to become ensnared in state and local permitting issues.

Portland' Lifeline systems
Portland' Lifeline systems

Oregon Geology maps out Portland's lifeline systems and Tsunami Hazard zones.

Shale Gas Map
Shale Gas Map

Natural gas is trapped within shale formations. The combination of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing has made large volumes of shale gas available for the first time and rejuvenated the natural gas industry in the United States. Shale gas resource and production estimates increased significantly between the 2010 and 2011 and are likely to increase further in the future.

Oregon Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley have both expressed reservations about gas exports because of likely impacts on domestic prices. Even LNG proponents concede that gas exports are likely to raise prices. And Rep. Peter DeFazio recently authored a bill that would prohibit the use eminent domain to build a pipeline if that pipe is used to export LNG, reports The Oregonian.


NEXT: Bio Mass in Oregon

Back to: Green industry <<