2010 Technology Community Survey: Difference between revisions

From PortlandWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
(2010)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:


252 respondents listed their job role as including programming, software development, or a similar title.
252 respondents listed their job role as including programming, software development, or a similar title.
68 were company owners, founders, or executives. 78 were in management roles.


'''Company size breakdown:'''
'''Company size breakdown:'''
Line 34: Line 35:


'''Technologies used:'''
'''Technologies used:'''
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-
! Name
! Name
Line 79: Line 80:
|}
|}


Other responses (in no particular order): SQL, Django, search engines, SQL Server, NHibernate, ArcGIS, Assembler, OWL, RDF, Sharepoint, C#, T-SQL, Flash, Silverlight, Adobe Flex/FlashBuilder, Excel VBA, Visual Foxpro, Delphi, Wordpress, Sitecore, Apache, ColdFusion, Linux, VB6, PostgreSQL, Crystal Reports, IIS, MVC, WCF, WF, WPF, Restfull WS, ESB, ActionScript, Rails, Zope, Scala, Stata, SAS, R, XML, PL/SQL, Powershell, Haskell, XSLT, MATLAB, JSP, Oracle, whiteboards, Photoshop, OmniGraffle, Common Lisp, Scheme, Joomla, Screenflow, Final Cut Pro, Sound Track Pro, MySQL, HLSL, Lua, Verilog, bash, Forth, assembly language, tcl/expect, Apache, Arduino, Google Web Toolkit, Coq, Isabelle, ExpressionEngine, DB2, WebSphere, jQuery, Flash, Clojure, Prolog, Apex/visualforce, UX, IxD, 3rd party APIs, concrete5, Clearspace, ARM assembly, MediaWiki, Thunderbird, Firefox, Grails, Tcl/tk, Eclipse, ArcMap, Erdas Imagine, Powerbuilder, DataFlex, Erlang, ocaml, hadoop, Agda, Smalltalk Fortress, LAMP, Pylons, GURU, Omega, Pascal, Prolog, Tapestry, sketchflow, Basalmiq, Torah
Other responses: 3rd party APIs, ActionScript, Adobe Flex/FlashBuilder, Agda, Apache, Apex/visualforce, ArcGIS, ArcMap, Arduino, ARM assembly, assembly language, Balsamiq, bash, C#, Clearspace, Clojure, ColdFusion, Common Lisp, concrete5, Coq, Crystal Reports, DataFlex, DB2, Delphi, Django, Eclipse, Erdas Imagine, Erlang, ESB, Excel VBA, ExpressionEngine, Final Cut Pro, Firefox, Flash, Flash, Forth, Google Web Toolkit, Grails, GURU, Hadoop, Haskell, HLSL, IIS, Isabelle, IxD, Joomla, jQuery, JSP, LAMP, Linux, Lua, MATLAB, MediaWiki, MVC, MySQL, NHibernate, ocaml, Omega, OmniGraffle, Oracle, OWL, Pascal, Photoshop, PL/SQL, PostgreSQL, Powerbuilder, Powershell, Prolog, Prolog, Pylons, R, Rails, RDF, REST, SAS, Scala, Scheme, Screenflow, search engines, Sharepoint, Silverlight, Sitecore, sketchflow, Smalltalk Fortress, Sound Track Pro, SQL, SQL Server, Stata, T-SQL, Tapestry, Tcl/expect, Tcl/tk, Thunderbird, Torah , UX, VB6, Verilog, Visual Foxpro, WCF, WebSphere, WF, whiteboards, Wordpress, WPF, XML, XSLT, Zope


'''General technology areas:'''
'''General technology areas:'''
{| class="wikitable" border="1"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-
! Type
! Type
Line 111: Line 112:
| 7.9%
| 7.9%
|}
|}
 
[[Category:2010]]
[[Category: Technology]]
[[Category: Technology]]

Latest revision as of 14:00, 30 September 2014

This survey was coordinated in May 2010 by Audrey Eschright and Eva Schweber. Silicon Florist covered the reasons for the survey here.

Some results:

667 people responded.

Median year of birth: 1956 (mean: 1972)

By gender:

  • 85% male
  • 12.3% female

(not all respondents answered)

77.5% were raised outside the Portland metro area.

67.5% currently live inside Portland city limits. 32.5% reported they do not.

Median personal income: $75,000 (mean: $79,758.35)

252 respondents listed their job role as including programming, software development, or a similar title. 68 were company owners, founders, or executives. 78 were in management roles.

Company size breakdown:

  • 17.6% sole proprietor
  • 13.2% <5 employees
  • 12.5% 5-15 employees
  • 6.7% 16-25 employees
  • 13.7% 25-100 employees
  • 36.3% 100+ employees

By sector:

  • 88.1% private companies
  • 9.2% nonprofits
  • 9% government

Technologies used:

Name % response
Objective C 14.3%
C/C++ 27.3%
HTML/CSS 73.8%
.NET 27.3%
.ASP 12.7%
Java 29.2%
PHP 33.9%
Ruby 26.4%
Python 26.6%
Perl 18.5%
Drupal 11.7%
Javascript 64.0%
Other 30.8%

Other responses: 3rd party APIs, ActionScript, Adobe Flex/FlashBuilder, Agda, Apache, Apex/visualforce, ArcGIS, ArcMap, Arduino, ARM assembly, assembly language, Balsamiq, bash, C#, Clearspace, Clojure, ColdFusion, Common Lisp, concrete5, Coq, Crystal Reports, DataFlex, DB2, Delphi, Django, Eclipse, Erdas Imagine, Erlang, ESB, Excel VBA, ExpressionEngine, Final Cut Pro, Firefox, Flash, Flash, Forth, Google Web Toolkit, Grails, GURU, Hadoop, Haskell, HLSL, IIS, Isabelle, IxD, Joomla, jQuery, JSP, LAMP, Linux, Lua, MATLAB, MediaWiki, MVC, MySQL, NHibernate, ocaml, Omega, OmniGraffle, Oracle, OWL, Pascal, Photoshop, PL/SQL, PostgreSQL, Powerbuilder, Powershell, Prolog, Prolog, Pylons, R, Rails, RDF, REST, SAS, Scala, Scheme, Screenflow, search engines, Sharepoint, Silverlight, Sitecore, sketchflow, Smalltalk Fortress, Sound Track Pro, SQL, SQL Server, Stata, T-SQL, Tapestry, Tcl/expect, Tcl/tk, Thunderbird, Torah , UX, VB6, Verilog, Visual Foxpro, WCF, WebSphere, WF, whiteboards, Wordpress, WPF, XML, XSLT, Zope

General technology areas:

Type % response
Mobile 34.7%
Web 76.7%
Hardware 16.1%
Software 76.3%
Open Source 53.8%
Proprietary Software 51.7%
Geolocation 13.8%
Other 7.9%
Retrieved from "https://portlandwiki.org/index.php?title=2010_Technology_Community_Survey&oldid=25086"