Liquified Natural Gas in Oregon: Difference between revisions

From PortlandWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
[http://www.oregonlng.com Oregon LNG] battled Clatsop County officials over its right to build the pipeline. Skeptics say the entire economic rationale for importing natural gas to the United States has become questionable given the huge new reserves of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shale_gas shale gas] in the United States and Canada.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasland Gasland], a documentary by Josh Fox, explored environmental impact of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fracturing hydraulic fracturing] used to extract the gas.
[http://www.oregonlng.com Oregon LNG] battled Clatsop County officials over its right to build the pipeline. Skeptics say the entire economic rationale for importing natural gas to the United States has become questionable given the huge new reserves of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shale_gas shale gas] in the United States and Canada.  [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasland Gasland], a documentary by Josh Fox, explored environmental impact of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_fracturing hydraulic fracturing] used to extract the gas.


[http://www.oregonlng.com/ The Liquefied Natural Gas terminal in Warrenton, Oregon] has been proposed to be located near the mouth of the Columbia River, just across Youngs Bay from Astoria. [http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2012/04/oregon_liquified_natural_gas_e.html But Oregon LNG's $6 billion plan has gone through a 180 degree change], reports The Oregonian. Now it would be a gas export facility, not a gas import facility.
[http://www.oregonlng.com/ The Liquefied Natural Gas export terminal in Warrenton, Oregon] would be located near the mouth of the Columbia River. [http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2012/04/oregon_liquified_natural_gas_e.html Now Oregon LNG's $6 billion plan has gone through a 180 degree change], reports The Oregonian.  
 
The Warrington LNG terminal now proposes a gas export facility, not a gas import facility.
   
   
[http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2012/03/port_of_coos_bay_wants_to_flip.html A similar proposal for an LNG export terminal in Coos Bay] was also originally an import project. Other export terminals are proposed on the coast of British Columbia, as well as the Gulf Coast of the United States. The successful use of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling techniques have flooded the domestic market with gas.
[http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2012/03/port_of_coos_bay_wants_to_flip.html A similar proposal for an LNG export terminal in Coos Bay] was also originally an import project. Other export terminals are proposed on the coast of British Columbia, as well as the Gulf Coast of the United States. The successful use of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling techniques have flooded the domestic market with gas.

Revision as of 08:44, 18 April 2012

Liquified Natural Gas in Oregon is part of the Green industry portal

<< Back to: Green industry <<


Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is natural gas (predominantly methane) that has been converted temporarily to liquid form for ease of storage or transport. LNG takes up about 1/600th the volume of natural gas in the gaseous state. For ship transport, the gas is chilled to approximately negative 260 °F (127 °C), condensing the gas into a liquid, making it easier to ship.

At the terminal, the LNG gas is transformed from liquid to a gaseous state and transported in a gaseous form through pipelines.

Three Liquefied Natural Gas projects have been proposed in Oregon — Oregon LNG (near Astoria), Bradwood Landing (near Claskanie), and Jordan Cove (near Coos Bay).

The Oregon LNG project, near Astoria, would include a marine receiving terminal, three full-containment 160,000 cubic meter LNG storage tanks, and facilities to support ship berthing and cargo offloading. The terminal would receive Liquefied natural gas shipped from overseas then transported down state through a new pipeline with a route similar to the competing Palomar Pipeline.

Astoria LNG Pipeline
Astoria LNG Pipeline

The proposed Oregon LNG receiving facility in Warrenton, Oregon, would be eight miles (13 km) west of Astoria, Oregon, on the Columbia River. The Astoria LNG proposal is the only Oregon LNG terminal that has not already received approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Oregon LNG battled Clatsop County officials over its right to build the pipeline. Skeptics say the entire economic rationale for importing natural gas to the United States has become questionable given the huge new reserves of shale gas in the United States and Canada. Gasland, a documentary by Josh Fox, explored environmental impact of hydraulic fracturing used to extract the gas.

The Liquefied Natural Gas export terminal in Warrenton, Oregon would be located near the mouth of the Columbia River. Now Oregon LNG's $6 billion plan has gone through a 180 degree change, reports The Oregonian.

The Warrington LNG terminal now proposes a gas export facility, not a gas import facility.

A similar proposal for an LNG export terminal in Coos Bay was also originally an import project. Other export terminals are proposed on the coast of British Columbia, as well as the Gulf Coast of the United States. The successful use of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling techniques have flooded the domestic market with gas.

New proposal for Astoria LNG Pipeline
New proposal for Astoria LNG Pipeline

Oregon LNGsays export economics from Oregon stack up well against Gulf Coast competitors. Oregon LNG is also proposing a different route for the pipeline, however.

"LNG import was really unpopular in Clatsop County, and LNG export is going to be wildly unpopular in Clatsop County," said Dan Serres, an organizer with the conservation group Columbia Riverkeeper. Both Oregon LNG and the Jordan Cove LNG proposal in Coos Bay are at the start of a long permitting odyssey.

The Bradwood Landing LNG import terminal, upriver near Claskanie, was apparently stopped in March of 2011, when a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision threw out the license for the Bradwood Landing terminal.

Proposed Bradwood Landing Site
Proposed Bradwood Landing Site

According to Columbia Riverkeeper Executive Director Brett VandenHeuvel, "Bradwood LNG was a dominant environmental issue for five years and now it is officially over." Foes feared possible impacts on fish, forests and farms.

Proposed Palomar pipeline.
Proposed Palomar pipeline.

The NorthernStar Natural Gas company planned the Palomar Pipeline, a joint venture between NW Natural and Calgary, Alberta-based TransCanada Corp to import Liquified Natural Gas. A planned 36-inch diameter pipeline would stretch 217 miles from TransCanada’s Gas Transmission Northwest Pipeline in central Oregon to a point on the Columbia River near Astoria where it was to connect the Bradwood Landing project.

Coos Bay Natural Gas Pipeline Propsal
Coos Bay Natural Gas Pipeline Propsal

The Jordan Cove LNG storage facility would be located within the Port of Coos Bay, approximately 7 nautical miles from the entrance of the navigation channel, and pipe it south to California. Oregon's Land Use Board of Appeals has kicked back Coos County's approval of the Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, ordering the county to reconsider the project's impact on the Olympia Oyster.

The 234-mile pipeline would carry gas from the proposed Jordan Cove liquefied natural gas terminal in Coos Bay to an interstate gas hub in Malin, near the California border in Central Oregon. From there, the gas would head south to California.


The Port of Coos Bay now wants to flip from importing to exporting liquefied natural gas, reports the Oregonian. Backers of the controversial Jordan Cove Energy Project are starting their regulatory odyssey anew, filing paperwork in Februrary, 2012 with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Jordan Cove and the associated Pacific Connector pipeline originally won federal approval in December 2009, only to become ensnared in state and local permitting issues.

Oregon Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley have both expressed reservations about gas exports because of likely impacts on domestic prices. Even LNG proponents concede that gas exports are likely to raise prices. And Rep. Peter DeFazio recently authored a bill that would prohibit the use eminent domain to build a pipeline if that pipe is used to export LNG, reports The Oregonian.

Portland' Lifeline systems
Portland' Lifeline systems

Oregon Geology maps out Portland's lifeline systems and Tsunami Hazard zones.

NEXT: Bio Mass in Oregon

Back to: Green industry <<