Talk:Portland: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Khris.soden (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(go right ahead!) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Uh, I think that this discussion page was all spam gibberish here previously, so I deleted it. Maybe this page could have the really basic essential details of the city? Like date the charter was granted, current population, etc.? And then it could kind of springboard off of that with reference links to city government, city history, city geography pages, etc.? I'm new to this wiki, so I'm a little concerned about stepping on toes and just formatting stuff right away. -[[user:khris.soden|Khris Soden]] 11:41 am, 8 November 2009 | Uh, I think that this discussion page was all spam gibberish here previously, so I deleted it. Maybe this page could have the really basic essential details of the city? Like date the charter was granted, current population, etc.? And then it could kind of springboard off of that with reference links to city government, city history, city geography pages, etc.? I'm new to this wiki, so I'm a little concerned about stepping on toes and just formatting stuff right away. -[[user:khris.soden|Khris Soden]] 11:41 am, 8 November 2009 | ||
:Go right ahead! Don't worry about mercilessly editing things; at this point, we just need content... ''any'' content. I think your ideas are good anyway; the one-sentence article is just a placeholder and needs to be expanded. -[[User:Kotra|kotra]] 19:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:45, 8 November 2009
Uh, I think that this discussion page was all spam gibberish here previously, so I deleted it. Maybe this page could have the really basic essential details of the city? Like date the charter was granted, current population, etc.? And then it could kind of springboard off of that with reference links to city government, city history, city geography pages, etc.? I'm new to this wiki, so I'm a little concerned about stepping on toes and just formatting stuff right away. -Khris Soden 11:41 am, 8 November 2009
- Go right ahead! Don't worry about mercilessly editing things; at this point, we just need content... any content. I think your ideas are good anyway; the one-sentence article is just a placeholder and needs to be expanded. -kotra 19:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC)